Mississippi Valley State University ACT Scores More

Intellectual Goodness in The Way of Reasons by Aristotle...

Intellectual Goodness in The Way of Reasons by Aristotle In the reading â€Å"The Way of Reason† Aristotle tries to define the good that is within mankind. He moves through a variety of exercises that narrow down and simplify the ideas that man is inherently good and that his tendency for it is deliberate and pre-destined. He looks at different activities, then breaks them down and finds the part that leads toward the final happiness. He feels that if man is truly good within his soul that he will be happy. Not necessarily happy as joyful, but, more like content or satisfied. He spends a large amount of time examining different virtues and behaviors and then determines what the outcomes of these activities are. Some examples are†¦show more content†¦And so he gains happiness knowing that he did the right thing without resorting to being foolhardy and selfish. Another example that Aristotle uses is physical pleasures. While these may make one happy, one needs temperance to draw the line between doing something for a greater good or doing it because it feels good. He creates a break between â€Å"a) pleasures of the soul and b) pleasures of the body.† (Gill, pg 359). Aristotle want to define that while people may derive pleasure from the senses, they need a temperance to prevent them from breaking away from the mean of pleasurable experiences and creating a desire that tries to draw them away. By enjoying the smell of a rose or incense at just the right degree instead of forsaking other things just for that physical pleasure. If a person makes every effort to recreate or prolong a physical sensation, then it becomes wrong. It pulls one away from being temperate and pulls away from attaining the right balance. Just as there is a balance for Aristotle of emotions like fear and rashness, there is a balance between enjoying somethi ng and being driven by the results of the experience. One thing that Aristotle does is refuse these feelings and behaviors from animals. He says that they are too low to truly identify and enjoy these feelings. â€Å"And if we extend our observation to the lower animals, we note that they, too, find nothing intrinsically pleasant in these sensations. A hunting dogShow MoreRelatedAristotle s Ethics Of Happiness1282 Words   |  6 Pagesethics of happiness and how happiness and reason relate to one another from Nicomachean Ethics will be discussed. For one to understand Aristotle’s point of view, one must first understand the meaning of good and happiness. If an individual is asked to explain what is good, they may simply begin to list out items that are good. Aristotle explained that a person can easily compose a list of good things like, it is good to have friends or to be healthy. What Aristotle meant by what is good is the searchRead MoreGreek Philosophies Impact On The Early Development Of Christian Thought1348 Words   |  6 Pagesevaluated. Theologists like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas both discovered the use of Aristotle in the formation of the Christian mind. Aristotle, a Greek philosopher, believed that all humans had a purpose and that the purpose was for the greater good. However, the good life or the blessed life for Aquinas and Augustine was heaven. For Greek thinkers like Aristotle or even Plato, human actions derived from reason, rationality, and intellect. Christian thinkers like Augustine saw philosophical reflectionRead MoreDavid Hume s Views On Morality972 Words   |  4 PagesHume focused on the question does our morality come from our rational nature or our sentiment nature? According to Hume, the judgments and recommendations of morality arise not from reason, but from moral sense. Hume argued that virtue is always accompanied by a feeling of pleasure, and vice by a feeling of pain. Therefore, we praise an instance of virtuous action precisely because it stimulates in us a pleasing feeling, and we avoid committing a vicious action because we anticipate that doing soRead MorePhilosophical Analysis of Aristotle883 Words   |  4 Pa ges Philosophical analysis of Aristotle Many theorists consider Aristotle to be the first person to use the term â€Å"ethics† in naming the field of study that had already been subject to develop by his predecessors Socrates and Plato. Philosophical ethics attempts in offering the rational response to the questions regarding how the human beings live. Aristotle used to be regarding politics and ethics as two related but very separate field of study because ethicsRead MorePlato And Aristotle s Theories Of Utilitarianism And Kantian Ethics1408 Words   |  6 PagesThe ancient theories of Plato and Aristotle differ greatly from the contemporary theories of Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics. Plato and Aristotle focused on the importance of virtue in an individual’s life. Plato believed that purity of the soul was the most important thing in life and can be achieved by mastering the four virtues: justice, wisdom, courage, and moderation. Aristotle believed that the goal of human life was to achieve happiness, wh ich is made possible by the cultivation of a justRead MorePlato vs. Aristotle: Virtue1656 Words   |  7 PagesPlato and Aristotle, arguably two of the most influential Greek philosophers, discussed their differing views on virtue extensively throughout many of their works. Although they agree that virtue is a desirable characteristic that will lead to happiness, the ultimate good, there exists between the two philosophies salient differences. While Plato believes only philosophers are capable of true, inherent virtue, Aristotle believes all men can be virtuous with practice and dedication. GREAT. WAY TO GETRead MoreTo What Extent Do Modern Versions of Virtue Ethics Address the Weaknesses of Aristotle’s Teachings on Virtue?1047 Words   |  5 Pagesa good life e.g. courage and honesty. Aristotle explains for a person to adopt these qualities into their own lives is to maximise their potential to achieve a happy life and he goes on to explain Eudaimonia as being a quality of this happiness. However Aristotle then explains that a person should not act virtuously just to achieve a particular end because he believes this to be a subordinate aim. A person that acts in a way to achieve goodness Aristotle explains is a superior aim and it is theseRead MorePlato s A Good Life1393 Words   |  6 Pagestalk about Plato’s student who ironically is Aristotle. The year Aristotle was born was in 384 B.C, when he turned eighteen years of age, he made the decision to leave and go learn with Plato at an academy. Aristotle claims that eudemonia, which means happiness, is the final end of all human action. It is the highest level of happiness and getting exactly what you desire. He then goes into detail about two different kinds of virtue: one being intellectual and moral. Considering Plato’s response toRead More Aristotle and the Doctrine of the Mean Essay1436 Words   |  6 PagesAristotle and the Doctrine of the Mean Aristotle seeks flourishing happiness in life. He believes that this can be achieved for each individual through the embracement of virtues. Aristotle believes that virtues are the mean of two vices. This is the basis of the Aristotelian â€Å"Doctrine of the Mean†. This paper will explore the basis of the Doctrine of the Mean, its connections to Eudaimonia, and its success or lack thereof. Eudaimonia is a Greek word whose meaningRead MoreAristotle on Happiness and Virtue Essay1749 Words   |  7 Pagessociety?’(Bessant, 2009). Similar questions were greatly discussed in the history by our ancestors in their philosophical discussions. The most ancient and long-lasting literature on moral principles and ethics were described by Greek philosopher Aristotle. He had an excellent command on various subjects ranging from sciences to mathematics and philosophy. He was also a student of a famous philosopher. His most important study on ethics, personal morality and virtues is ‘The Nicomachean Ethics’, which

The Matrix Organization Essay Sample free essay sample

Matrix Organization Defined There are three ways an organisation can be officially structured: a ) by map ; B ) by product/market ; and c ) matrix signifier. Matrix signifier combines functional and merchandise sections in a double authorization system. In matrix signifier. there are two types of design that exist at the same clip. Permanent functional sections have authorization for the public presentation and professional criterions of their units. while undertaking squads are created as needed to transport out specific plans ( Stoner and Wankel. 1987 ) . We will write a custom essay sample on The Matrix Organization Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In this type of organisational construction. each worker is assigned to two foremans in two different hierarchies. In the â€Å"functional† hierarchy. it is assured that each type of expert in the organisation is well-trained. and measured by a foreman who is super-expert in the same field. The other hierarchy is â€Å"executive† and it tries to finish undertakings utilizing the experts. ( hypertext transfer protocol: //en. wikipedia. org ) Advantages and Disadvantages Harmonizing to Stoner and Wankel ( 1987 ) . the following are the advantages of matrix organisation: gives flexibleness to organisation ; stimulates interdisciplinary cooperation ; involves and challenges people ; develops employee accomplishments ; frees top direction for planning ; motivates people to place with end merchandise ; and allows experts to be moved to important countries as needed. The disadvantages that Stoner and Wankel ( 1987 ) identified are: hazards making a feeling of lawlessness ; encourages power battles ; may take to more treatment than action ; requires high interpersonal accomplishments ; is dearly-won to implement ; hazards duplicate of attempt by project squads ; and affects morale when forces are rearranged. Mentions: Stoner. J. and Wankel. C. 1987. Management. 3rderectile dysfunction. Prentice-Hall International. Inc. hypertext transfer protocol: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Organization. Viewed on June 18. 2006